Interactions Between the 3 Levels of Meaning
![]() | ||||
image by Stuart Thursby |
SUMMARY
This Visual Communication piece works to merge the
representational, abstract, and symbolic levels of meaning in an exciting and
thought-provoking way.
REPRESENTATIONAL LEVEL
On a representational
level, this image is in itself a ‘design’. We see familiar objects in the
letters we recognize, but they’ve been assembled together compositionally to
form a bigger picture than the sum of their individual parts. The impact of
this is strong, because the designer did it well. Again, you could say that
what is being represented here is an
interesting design.
The impact this
work has on the viewer, I would say, is that of pleasure and intrigue. Pleasure
in seeing such a beautifully composed piece, and intrigue due to the process
needed to decode the message within.
Through the 3
levels of visual meaning, the ideas of ‘typography’ and ‘design’ are being
presented – the words, on a representational level, abstractly in the
composition of the page, and symbolically through the letters used to compose
the image, which ultimately express an idea.
ABSTRACT LEVEL
The understructure
of this image is contrasting black and white lines weaved against a bold red
background. The kinesthetic quality of this is quite arresting, providing a
direct emotional impact. The juxtaposing black and white against the saturated
red makes this image feel powerful to the viewer.
The abstract
elements used to compose this piece help fulfill the representational level’s
goal of providing a design. This is called functional abstraction. Through the letters, (or essentially, lines) and
colors, a calculated and interesting design has been achieved. The abstract
level is working with the representational here by showcasing the words
‘design’ and ‘typography’ in an abstract way.
It is interesting
to see the symbolic elements at play here. They aren’t fully exposed and
immediately read. Instead, the viewer has to follow the weave of the pattern of
letters to decode the phrase “Design is Typography.”
Again, Typography and
Design are presented here representationally, symbolically, and abstractly because
the image makes the viewer ponder the concept of typography and how we use it
as designers to communicate ideas. It should be noted that this image could have
been made with any number of typeface, but I feel the designer chose Helvetica
because of its more simplified, symbolic nature and how that lends itself to
composing this very active abstract design.
SYMBOLIC LEVEL
Symbolically, the
image uses letters to express its message. In fact, the entire piece is
composed of letters, or symbols, to create the design. These aren’t just
arbitrary lines that were used to create this piece, but coded symbols assembled
purposely to express an idea. The idea that “Design is Typography” is essentially
proven here by the very nature of this piece.
The impact on the
viewer, on this symbolic level, is quite exciting because it’s advancing the
symbolic level of typography to both an abstract and representational plane
through the way that this piece was constructed. Imagine if all our sentences
were composed in such visually remarkable ways, rather than simply laid out in
plain fashion on a straight line.
No comments:
Post a Comment